Stick.

Last night, Laura asked me if we were going to see "Transformers" when it comes out. Surprising her, I said, "No, I hadn't planned on it."

Now don't get me wrong. Growing up I was obsessed with the toys had had "more than meets the eye." But there is no yearning whatsoever to see this movie. It's kind of surprising to me, too. But, I think that there is reason that nostalgia and nausea sound similar. I can only look back for so long (I type this, of course, while listening to 90's alternative on my radio).

It's interesting, though, that there are so many things that are now being geared to people my age that hearken back to my childhood and youth - Transformers, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and for the girls, Nancy Drew and Strawberry Shortcake. Of course, it's to capitalize on our generation who are now becoming parents, and seeing where there is a huge market to make toys for the kids of kids who never grew up. Maybe "Toys'R'Us" was as sinister as my mom made it out to be.

So now, I have an idea. If old is new again, and the market is there to bring back toys from previous generations, maybe some even older toys have some profit potential. I'm thinking of packaging and marketing "The Stick." I'm pretty sure my dad played with one, certainly my grandfather, possibly even my great-grandfather. Just think of this untapped potential of reviving these "classic toys." I can see it now, "The Stick," "The Can," "The Rock," and the ever-popular, "The Spin Around Until You're Sick."

I think that it can work. Any venture capitalists who want to get in on ground level?

The source of this week's teasing from my wife

Unclutterer: The end of the chip-clip



I first saw this on Lifehacker a while ago, and even recently implemented it. I thought it was handy, but Laura saw it as a testament to my geekiness. It's a close call, I guess.

It's not news, it's...

Enough.

Enough already. Enough with the celebrity "news." It's becoming more "pornographic" than what I get bombarded with in my email. There's no reason that the local news should be reporting on Paris Hilton and whether or not she's in jail. Yes, it is news on a fundamental level, but only so much that it's entertainment news and a possibly a further illustration of how the legal system needs reform on many levels. It doesn't deserve the attention it is getting right now though from mainstream media - I think Access Hollywood and the like can cover it well enough where it belongs.

Maybe I just don't get it, but I've never been into the celebrity obsession. Magazines like the Sun, Enquirer, etc. and shows like AH and Entertainment tonight don't appeal to me whatsoever. But yet, apparently they are widely popular.

"Reality TV" doesn't do it for me anyway. About the only "reality TV" I can stomach is what you find on Discovery or TLC, mainly in the form of Deadliest Catch and Mythbusters (yes, I'm a geek). TV in general has lost its luster. As part of the TV generation, I can remember growing up thinking as I was getting ready to spend a week at camp, "How will I be able to make it all week without TV." Granted, I did make it, and even at home, I played outside and did other non-TV activities, but TV was a major part of my regular activity.

Now, not so much. With our free time decreasing, news being dumbed down and increasingly anemic, programming based on cheap production and maximum outrage, and being able to be more selective through our DVR, we've gotten to where we'll watch maybe an hour of primetime programming a night - if we're lucky.

I guess I'm just looking for more substance in my entertainment and wish that more people felt the same. I don't want to necessarily be challenged and disturbed every night, but I'd like for my news to at least be something more than the equivalent of jingling your keys in front of an infant. Thankfully, there is at least the web in which I can get apprised of what's going on in the world, but even that is being challenged with the threat to net neutrality.

Bottom line, I want more. Not so much in quantity, but in quality, and I wish you do to.

GTD (Getting Things Done)

(Image credit from The New Shelton.)

I'm trying to be more productive with my time throughout the day. I've become a big fan of a couple of sites, Lifehacker and Unclutterer, that really appeal to my OCD side. Of some of the many things that have been suggested to GTD (Get Things Done), email has been tapped as being the source of the least AND most productivity. It's all a matter in how it's used. I don't remember the link, but the study was done with people completing tasks under different conditions and it turns out, in terms of accuracy and adjusted IQ, someone who is stoned is more productive and intelligent than someone who is "plugged in" all the time.

Since being "plugged in" doesn't have all the other benefits of the other option, I'm turning of my automatic email notification and only checking email once an hour. It will be a while before I can move to the suggested practice of doing email only twice a day at 11:00 and 4:00, but I've already noticed a huge difference in productivity by feeling that the most effective use of my time is not immediately responding to every email as they come in. I wonder, what are some practices that others use to GTD and get the clutter out of their lives?

If a Conference happens and no one is there...?

This year's Annual conference is over and done. It didn't really seem like it was time for it to happen - this year has flown by.

At least for my responsibilities (being in charge of voting and the tellers), things went much better than I imagined they would. As Sherill came to find out, I don't have much patience for stupidity, rather, stupid decisions and results that can easily be avoided by listening. Fortunately, we only had a few episodes of group stupidity. However, where I had anticipated the laity would need more hand holding and scolding, it was the clergy that apparently left their village an idiot short that weekend. The things were nothing major, but it's mind-boggling how difficult filling in a bubble on a Scantron card is for some people. But I digress...

I will say that a member here at Trinity did almost send me into a panic attack when I mistook the sheets of stickers he was giving out to children for more ballots that needed to be counted.

I was able to reconnect with a few people from college, high school, and camp that I had not seen in a while, which evokes the original purpose of Conference. But many conversations were cut short due to other responsibilities. I need to do better in maintaining those relationships.

Overall, I think I had a good time at Conference. I worked with a great group of people, and despite running around constantly, I wasn't as drained as last year. This doesn't mean though, that I am volunteering to be an assistant to the Conference Secretary again... :-)